← Home/Solutions/Claude Ignite · Entry point 1

Clarify your AI strategy
in 4 weeks.

Flash audit, use case prioritization matrix + ROI, 12–24 month roadmap. For CEOs, CDOs, and CIOs who want to know where to start — without getting it wrong.

What you get

Full flash audit

IT, process, and data mapping. CIO / CEO / business unit interviews.

3–5 priority use cases

Scored on value, feasibility, estimated ROI, and production timeline.

Quantified business case

Estimated gain, implementation cost, payback period per use case.

12–24 month roadmap

Go/No-Go milestones, success criteria, tracking KPIs.

For whom

You sense the potential of AI but don't know where to start.

Claude Ignite is built for CEOs, CDOs, and CIOs in exploration who want to understand before committing — not for those seeking another tool benchmark.

Profile 1
CEO / General Manager
You've heard about AI in every meeting. You want to concretely understand what it changes for you, with numbers — not promises.
Strategic visionROI first
Profile 2
CIO / CTO
You have the tech stack, the teams, and some ideas. But you lack a methodology for prioritization and a solid business case to present to the exec committee.
PrioritizationTech feasibility
Profile 3
CDO / Transformation Director
You're driving digital transformation and must arbitrate between 10 potential AI projects. You need an objective, defensible decision matrix.
Trade-offsGovernance
The 3 phases

Claude Ignite, a structured.
sprint. Each phase produces a deliverable.

No black box. At the end of each phase, you have a usable document — not another report to file away.

1Flash AuditWeek 1 · 5 days

Rapid mapping of your IT environment, business processes, and data. CIO · CEO · 3–5 business manager interviews.

CIO/CEO/Business interviews
IT & data flow mapping
Data inventory (quality, GDPR)
CISO constraints
Deliverables
Flash audit report 30-50pAnnotated IT mappingData inventorySecurity constraints
2Use Case ScoringWeeks 2–3 · 10 days

Value/Feasibility matrix across all opportunities. Each use case evaluated on 6 criteria. Selection of the 3–5 priority cases.

Value: volume × unit gain
Feasibility: data + integration
Timeline: Quick Win vs Transformation
Risk: LOOP™ zone
Deliverables
Complete prioritization matrixBusiness case 3-5 priority use casesGain · cost · payback quantifiedModule recommendation
3Exec Committee PresentationWeek 4 · 5 days

Presentation to the executive committee. 12–24 month roadmap with Go/No-Go milestones. Recommendation for next entry point.

Milestone roadmap 12-24 months
Budget estimate per phase
Tracking KPIs defined
Next-step recommendation
Deliverables
ExCom deck 15-20 slidesMilestone roadmapBudget per phaseKPIs definedKoneetiv entry point
Phase 1
S1
Week 1
Flash Audit
5 business days

Rapid mapping of your IT environment, business processes, and available data. Semi-structured interviews with the CIO, CEO, and 3 to 5 key business managers. Identification of high-volume operational pain points and security constraints.

Interviews

CIO · CEO · HR, Finance, Ops, Sales, Legal managers (per scope)

Mapping

Existing IT systems, data flows, business tools, current integrations

Data inventory

Available sources, quality, accessibility, GDPR / classification constraints

CISO constraints

Security policy, hosting, trust zones, risk appetite

Phase 1 Deliverables
Flash audit report 30-50pAnnotated IT mappingData inventoryDocumented security constraints
Phase 2
S2-3
Weeks 2-3
Use Case Scoring
10 business days

Application of the Value / Feasibility matrix across all identified opportunities. Each use case is assessed on 6 criteria: processed volume, estimated ROI, technical complexity, data availability, governance risk, and time to production. Selection of the 3 to 5 priority use cases.

Criterion 1 — Value

Processed volume × estimated unit gain. Gross ROI calculation before implementation costs.

Criterion 2 — Feasibility

Data availability, integration complexity, LOOP™ Zone aptitude.

Criterion 3 — Timeline

Estimated time to value: Quick Win (3-8 wks.) or Transformation (8-16 wks.).

Criterion 4 — Risk

Applicable LOOP™ Zone, required escalation level, sensitivity of accessed data.

Phase 2 Deliverables
Complete prioritization matrixBusiness case 3-5 priority use casesGain · cost · payback quantifiedKoneetiv module recommendation
Phase 3
S4
Week 4
Exec Committee Presentation
5 business days

Presentation of results to the executive committee. 12 to 24-month roadmap with quarterly Go/No-Go milestones. Recommendation on the next entry point: starting Moove to Claude on the first priority use case, or Claude Cockpit if your organization needs global AI governance first.

Milestone roadmap

12 to 24 months. Quarterly Go/No-Go. Success criteria per phase defined upfront.

Budget estimate

Indicative envelope per phase. Financing model (grants, direct investment).

Tracking KPIs

Performance metrics defined before deployment. Monitoring dashboard.

Next-step recommendation

Moove to Claude · Claude Cockpit · CIO Boost — based on your maturity.

Phase 3 Deliverables
ExCom deck 15-20 slidesMilestone roadmap 12-24 monthsBudget per phaseKPIs definedKoneetiv entry point
Deliverables

You leave with a plan.
Not more slides.

4 actionable documents. Each usable immediately — in exec committee, with your teams, or to trigger the next step.

01
Flash audit report
30 to 50 pages. Annotated IT mapping, data inventory, identified processes, documented CISO constraints.
02
Use case prioritization matrix + ROI
All identified use cases scored on value, feasibility, estimated ROI, and production timeline.
03
12–24 month roadmap
Quarterly Go/No-Go milestones. Module sequencing. Success criteria per phase.
04
Module recommendation
For each priority use case: which Koneetiv module, estimated deployment timeline, required integrations.
What changes · Documented ROI
87%
of AI projects without methodology remain pilots
McKinsey 2025
12×
more projects in production with governance
BCG 2026
2-4
weeks for a complete, quantified action plan
Claude Ignite
6 sem.
from Claude Ignite to the first agent in production
Guaranteed timeline
Comparison

Claude Ignite vs. the alternatives.

Why not a traditional consulting firm, an internal POC, or an AI benchmarking tool?

✦ RecommendedClaude Ignite
Timeline2-4 weeks
Final deliverableQuantified action plan + ExCom deck
ROI per use caseQuantified and defensible
Claude / Anthropic expertiseOfficial partner · 10 certified
Integrated governanceLOOP™ from scoring
Natural next stepImmediate deployment possible
Traditional consulting firm
Timeline3-6 months
Final deliverableGeneric PowerPoint report
ROI per use caseEstimated (poorly sourced)
Claude / Anthropic expertiseAgnostic or generalist
Integrated governanceGeneric recommendations
Natural next stepNew RFP required
Internal POC
TimelineOpen-ended (often abandoned)
Final deliverablePartial technical documentation
ROI per use caseRarely calculated
Claude / Anthropic expertiseNone
Integrated governanceNot addressed
Natural next stepInternal resources to find
CriterionClaude IgniteTraditional consulting firmInternal POC
Timeline2-4 weeks3-6 monthsOpen-ended (often abandoned)
Final deliverableQuantified action plan + ExCom deckGeneric PowerPoint reportPartial technical documentation
ROI per use caseQuantified and defensibleEstimated (poorly sourced)Rarely calculated
Claude / Anthropic expertiseOfficial partner · 10 certifiedAgnostic or generalistNone
Integrated governanceLOOP™ from scoringGeneric recommendationsNot addressed
Natural next stepImmediate deployment possibleNew RFP requiredInternal resources to find
What's next?

Claude Ignite opens the path forward.
You choose your pace.

Every entry point leads to deployment — the difference is ambition and starting maturity.

Example outcomes

What Claude Ignite has uncovered.

A few priority use cases identified during recent Claude Ignite engagements — and the agents deployed shortly after.

E-commerce · Customer Support
Snowleader customer support agent
Use case identified via Claude Ignite: 2,400 tickets/month handled manually, 48h average response time. Deployed in 6 weeks.
−60% response time24/7
HR Firm · Recruitment
Selescope sourcing agent
Use case identified via Claude Ignite: 60% of consultant time absorbed by CV screening. ROI score #1 in the matrix.
×3 candidates−70% sourcing
Mid-market · Finance
Accounting close agent
Use case identified via Claude Ignite: Monthly close taking 10.8 days, 4 people mobilized. ROI score #2 in the matrix.
10.8d → 6.2d−43%

A first conversation,
30 minutes.

We ask 5 questions about your environment. We tell you whether Claude Ignite is right for you — or if a different entry point is better suited to your situation.

Launch Claude Ignite →